This informal CPD article, ‘Teaching Writing Skills: Comparing Social Media Writing and Academic Writing, was provided by International Language Experts, who organise language training for companies and individuals.
In contemporary education, teaching writing skills often involves navigating two contrasting landscapes: social media writing and academic writing. While both forms of writing serve communicative purposes, they differ significantly in structure, tone, and objectives. As educators, understanding these distinctions is crucial to designing writing lessons that are engaging and relevant to students. This article examines the key differences between social media and academic writing, explores whether social media can learn from academic writing, and suggests how teachers can make writing lessons more engaging.
Differences between Social Media Writing and Academic Writing
Social media writing and academic writing serve different purposes and audiences, which largely accounts for the stark differences between the two. Social media writing is often characterised by brevity, accessibility, and immediacy. Posts on platforms like Twitter, Instagram, or LinkedIn rely on short, impactful captions to convey ideas quickly and efficiently. This style prioritises engagement, using catchy phrases, humour, and visual elements to capture attention. As Obar and Wildman (2015) argue, social media has democratised information sharing, allowing for instant, often informal, communication without the necessity for thorough fact-checking or references.
On the other hand, academic writing is a structured and evidence-based form of communication that requires depth of analysis and critical thinking. Academic essays, research papers, and dissertations are generally longer and involve complex ideas supported by scholarly evidence. According to Hyland (2000), academic writing aims to establish credibility and contribute to ongoing conversations in specific fields. It is grounded in rigor, necessitating clear organisation, accurate referencing, and the use of discipline-specific terminology.
One of the key distinctions is the presence of sources. While academic writing must be supported by well-researched, credible references, social media posts can often be speculative, opinion-based, or subjective without the need for citations. Additionally, academic writing assumes a more formal tone, with careful consideration of grammar, style, and structure, whereas social media writing may be more conversational and informal, with the use of abbreviations, emojis, and hashtags (Al-Ali, 2014).
Can Social Media Learn from Academic Writing?
Although social media writing and academic writing appear to exist at opposite ends of the writing spectrum, there are aspects that social media writers could learn from academic writing. One potential area for improvement is the inclusion of evidence-based content. Social media posts, though impactful and concise, often spread misinformation due to the absence of factual references (Pennycook & Rand, 2021). Incorporating elements of academic writing, such as verifying sources and citing credible references, could improve the trustworthiness of content shared on these platforms. For example, platforms like LinkedIn, which blend professional discourse with social media dynamics, can benefit from academic rigor by encouraging users to back their claims with data or reputable sources.
Moreover, academic writing's emphasis on structure and clarity can also inform social media writing. While social media content is brief, the message it conveys can sometimes be fragmented or oversimplified. By adopting clear argumentation strategies from academic writing, social media posts could enhance the clarity and coherence of the content, allowing readers to follow arguments more logically.